Why is there a difference between the values for the wind energy extrapolation on netztransparenz.de/menu item "Market premium" and the values for wind energy on other platforms?
When publishing the online extrapolation of the actual values for onshore wind energy, the data for the years up to and including 2014 refers to the total electricity feed-in generated nationwide and marketed by the TSOs or direct marketers. For data from January 2015 onwards, the extrapolation in accordance with Annex 1 No. 3.1 EEG is published here. Reductions in the feed-in capacities of the installations on which the extrapolation is based are therefore not taken into account in the extrapolation. A comparison with the figures prior to 2015 or a comparison with values on other platforms is therefore only possible to a limited extent and taking into account the different calculation specifications from the respective underlying EEG.
Is there any further information from the TSOs on the calculation methodology of the market premium projections?
The TSOs calculate the online projections in accordance with No. 5.1 of Annex 1 to the EEG from a representative number of measured reference plants. Reductions in the feed-in capacities of the reference plants on which the extrapolation is based are accordingly not taken into account in the extrapolation. For legal reasons, we are unfortunately unable to provide further details.
Additional notes:
The published RD data contain the RD requested by the TSOs. The DSO RD is also relevant for the online projection.
Furthermore, the online projection does not take into account not only grid-side curtailments but also market-side curtailments. Market-side curtailments are not published by the TSOs.
Is the feed-in profile of the market premium projections comparable with the actual feed-in of all RE plants feeding into the grid in Germany?
According to No. 5.1 of Annex 1 to the EEG, the feed-in profile of the online extrapolation does not reflect the reductions in feed-in capacity, i.e. the assumption is made as if the RE installations were feeding in fully without reduction. This means that the feed-in profile virtually corresponds to the actual feed-in of all RE plants plus the reductions in feed-in capacity.