How is a “Use Instead of Curtail” activation remunerated?
By participating in the mechanism under Section 13k EnWG, participants do not receive free electricity from the TSO. Instead, they initially procure the allocated curtailed electricity volumes themselves, for example through the day-ahead market or alternative power supply contracts (e.g. PPAs). The resulting electricity procurement costs are initially borne by the participant.
Following successful activation and verification of actual electricity consumption within the periods specified by the TSO, participants receive a financial reimbursement and, where applicable, compensation of electricity-related ancillary costs in the following month. The basis for this remuneration is the curtailed electricity volume that was allocated on the previous day, confirmed by the participant and actually measured.
The reimbursement of electricity procurement costs is provided through a difference-price remuneration mechanism (“financial reimbursement”). This reimbursement is calculated as the difference between the applicable Day-Ahead price for the respective quarter-hour and the participant’s bid price (for competitive tenders from 1 October 2026 onwards), or the predefined 13k price during the pilot phase until 30 September 2026 inclusive. As a result, the effective electricity procurement costs for the allocated electricity volumes can be significantly reduced.
In addition, electricity-related ancillary costs may be partially compensated. These include variable components, grid charges, levies and surcharges, concession fees, electricity tax, fixed components, capacity-based grid tariffs and other fixed network charges. The individual level of compensation is communicated to each participant before the beginning of participation for the respective calendar year. In most cases, full compensation of electricity-related ancillary costs for the allocated electricity volumes is possible.
A simplified example for a hypothetical quarter-hour
- Allocated electricity volume: 10 MWh
- Day-Ahead price: 100 €/MWh
- Bid price: 30 €/MWh
- Electricity-related ancillary costs: 150 €/MWh
Step 1 – Initial costs (Electricity procurement costs and ancillary costs) borne by the participant
10 MWh × (100 + 150) €/MWh = €2,500
Step 2 – Remuneration paid by the TSO in the following month by financial reimbursement and ancillary cost compensation:
10 MWh × ((100 €/MWh − 30 €/MWh) + 150 €/MWh) = €2,200
Step 3 – Effective electricity costs
€2,500 − €2,200 = €300
Further details regarding the remuneration framework can be found in the contractual documents.
Is the bid price subject to any limitations?
Yes. Participants determine a bid price for each relief facility or relief facility group one month in advance for each calendar month. This bid price must not fall below the minimum price established by the TSOs. The minimum price defines the lower limit for bid submissions and is set annually by the TSOs. It is currently in the range of 20 to 25 €/MWh.The currently applicable minimum price can be found under Compensation Parameters.
What happens if the Day-Ahead price is lower than the bid price?
In this case, the participant does not receive any financial reimbursement. However, the participant is not required to make any repayment either.
Why is the minimum price 20–25 €/MWh rather than 0 €/MWh?
The legal framework requires remuneration to be limited to the redispatch costs that would otherwise arise (Section 13k (6) No. 4 EnWG). To ensure compliance with this requirement while simultaneously enabling participation by all eligible technology segments through the compensation of electricity-related ancillary costs, a minimum bid price is specified. A lower minimum price would reduce the possible compensation of electricity-related ancillary costs to such an extent that participation by Segment 1 facilities could become uneconomic or, in some cases, impossible.
Further details regarding the remuneration framework and the methodology for determining the minimum price can be found in the Implementation Concept .
During tender periods, increased renewable generation means the Day-Ahead price is always ≤ 0 €/MWh, so no remuneration will ever be paid.
No. An analysis conducted by the TSOs covering the tender periods between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2026, together with the corresponding Day-Ahead prices, showed that the Day-Ahead price exceeded 20 €/MWh in more than 75% of quarter-hours. On average, the Day-Ahead price within tender periods during this timeframe was approximately 60 €/MWh.
Even in these situations (financial reimbursement = €0) electricity consumption can still be economically attractive because the Day-Ahead price is already below the participant’s individual bid price and electricity-related ancillary costs are additionally compensated (fully in almost all cases).
The minimum price is too high for hydrogen electrolysers.
The TSOs assume that the current minimum price of 20–25 €/MWh does not generally impair the economic viability of hydrogen electrolysers. This assumption is based on the fact that renewable electricity supply contracts required for RFNBO-compliant hydrogen production are currently typically concluded at higher price levels.
The TSOs further assume that hydrogen electrolysers aim to produce renewable hydrogen in accordance with the RFNBO requirements stemming from the delegated act under RED II Article 27, and the German implementation set out in the 37th BImSchV. As a consequence, electrolysers generally need to secure long-term fixed-price PPAs from renewable energy sources.Depending on technology and contractual structure, current indicative PPA price levels are typically in the range of 50–85 €/MWh (https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/02/09/solar-wind-ppa-prices-continue-to-fall-in-europe/). Under current market conditions, the minimum price therefore remains significantly below this range, making supplementary electricity procurement through the Section 13k mechanism financially attractive. The TSOs also assume that the tender periods under Section 13k EnWG largely overlap with the production periods that hydrogen electrolysers would have operated in anyway under their wind-oriented PPAs. Accordingly, participation in the Section 13k mechanism is generally not expected to impose additional operational requirements on electrolysers. Furthermore, hydrogen produced during a Section 13k tender period may be classified as renewable hydrogen under the 37th BImSchV, which may further improve its economic attractiveness.
Are electricity-related ancillary costs such as grid charges compensated?
Yes. Compensated cost elements include grid charges, levies and surcharges, concession fees, electricity tax. Both variable and fixed cost components are eligible. However, compensation is capped to ensure that the “Use Instead of Curtail” mechanism does not become more expensive than the alternative redispatch costs. Each participant's individual compensation limit is communicated before the start of participation for the respective calendar year. In the vast majority of cases, full compensation of electricity-related ancillary costs for the allocated electricity volumes is possible.
Is compensation of fixed electricity-related ancillary costs possible for seasonally available facilities?
In principle, yes. Provided that sufficient “Use Instead of Curtail” activation hours occur during the available operating period, participants may receive full or partial compensation of the capacity-based component of network tariffs.
Is allocated curtailed electricity considered “green”?
When curtailed electricity volumes are allocated, participants do not receive guarantees of origin for renewable electricity pursuant to Section 42 EnWG. However, products manufactured using allocated curtailed electricity volumes may, in certain cases, be classified as renewable:
- Hydrogen produced using electricity allocated through the “Use Instead of Curtail” mechanism is considered renewable under Section 9 of the Ordinance on the Creditability of Electricity-Based Fuels (“Verordnung zur Anrechnung von strombasierten Kraftstoffen”).
- Pursuant to Section 16 of the Gas, Heat and Cooling Guarantees of Origin Register Ordinance (“Gas-Wärme-Kälte-Herkunftsnachweisregister-Verordnung”), guarantees of origin for heat produced using electricity allocated through the mechanism may be possible in the future. However, no definitive regulatory framework currently exists.
Information on guarantees of origin for renewable electricity can be found here (in German): Nachweissysteme für Energie und Klimaschutz | Umweltbundesamt .
At present, no guarantee-of-origin register for gas and heat is available from the German Environment Agency (status: June 2026).
What data are required for settlement?
The following data are used for settlement:
- Individual electricity-related ancillary costs collected during prequalification as part of the review of ancillary cost compensation.
- Operational process data, particularly the allocated and confirmed curtailed electricity volumes.
- Metering data: By signing the framework agreement, the participant authorises the TSO to use metering values transmitted pursuant to the German Metering Point Operation Act (Messstellenbetriebsgesetz) for settlement and verification purposes.